Katerina Siniakova vs Ruth Roura Llaverias Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Recent analysis of second serve performance over the last six months reveals that Siniakova has achieved a 39.6% success rate in winning points on their second serve compared to Llaverias, who has a slightly lower rate at 36.55%. This statistic closely correlates with match prediction reliability, offering insights into potential match outcomes.

In terms of return game performance, Llaverias outshines Siniakova by winning 58.39% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Siniakova stands at 51.07%. For first serve returns, Llaverias again holds a slight advantage, converting 34.35% of opportunities compared to Siniakova's 32.19%. These figures provide a beneficial reference for determining the preferred player in head-to-head matchups.

When under pressure, Siniakova has saved 55.16% of breakpoints in recent competition, outpacing Llaverias who has managed to save 42.78% of such crucial points. This statistic serves as a useful indicator for considering in-game betting predictions.

Looking at the overall performance over the past year, Siniakova boasts a win percentage of 60.34% (35 wins, 23 losses), while Llaverias follows at 52.38% (22 wins, 20 losses). This metric contributes to an overarching head-to-head comparison, offering a broader view of expected outcomes.

Analyzing surface preference, both players show a penchant for clay courts. Siniakova has a 63% win rate (128 wins, 76 losses) on clay, which stands as her best career surface. Llaverias possesses a similar affinity with a 60% win rate (34 wins, 23 losses) on clay. However, both show reduced success on hard surfaces, marking them as their weakest.

Considering player levels and event participation, Siniakova spent the last year predominantly in main tour events, securing a 65.63% win rate (21 wins, 11 losses). In contrast, Llaverias has mainly competed in Futures/ITF tournaments, marking a 61.9% success rate (13 wins, 8 losses). Comparing these stats, it is essential to account for the variance in event levels they competed in.

Quality of opponents is another critical factor, with Siniakova regularly facing higher-ranked adversaries, having encountered opponents with an average rank of 84.09. Llaverias, on the other hand, played against players with an average rank of 451.12, suggesting differing competition levels.

Deciding set performance can offer additional betting insights, with Siniakova winning 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months compared to Llaverias' 50%. When matches reach this critical stage, Siniakova demonstrates a stronger composure.

In terms of breakpoint opportunities, Siniakova converts 43.1% of chances, slightly ahead of Llaverias at 41.22%. This aspect can be particularly enlightening for in-game live betting strategies.

Examining these factors, Siniakova's overall stronger statistics, especially at higher competition levels and her consistent performances under pressure, suggest that she is more likely to emerge victorious in this encounter. Her historical ability to face tougher opponents and convert crucial in-match opportunities positions her as the favorite in this match prediction model.